GnosysLabs/GitHop
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Define HopWeb as a prompt-native forge built on a maintainable Gitea foundation

Browse Source 
Hop-State: A_06FN3NFQ6P95HFKCSC22JMR
Hop-Proposal: R_06FN3NF43ARPM6SBXX0F15R
Hop-Task: T_06FN3MVGY3MT82ESQ89BND0
Hop-Attempt: AT_06FN3MVGY092BFA5MR9C7EG
This commit is contained in:
Hop
2026-07-11 08:40:04 -07:00
parent 5da8983cb6
commit dd2c0abfd2
3 changed files with 296 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
docs/product-blueprint.md
+170
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
# HopWeb product blueprint
## Product position
HopWeb is not "Gitea with AI buttons." It is a forge whose source of truth is a
causal record of intent and verified outcomes, with Git underneath for universal
tool compatibility.
The core screen should answer four questions without reconstructing them from a
commit history:
1. What outcome was requested?
2. Who or what tried to produce it?
3. What exact result was checked, and what passed?
4. Which outcome became shared truth, and why?
## Concept mapping
| Conventional forge | HopWeb primary concept | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Issue | Task | Outcome plus its evolving prompt history |
| Branch/worktree | Attempt | Isolated work by a human, agent, or team |
| Commit | Checkpoint/state | Immutable tree plus causal parents and metadata |
| CI status | Evidence | Bound to the exact checkpoint that was tested |
| Pull request | Proposal | Candidate outcome with intent, evidence, and diff |
| Merge | Accept/land | Advances the accepted state after validation |
| Commit graph | State graph | Includes prompts, checkpoints, proposals, and outcomes |
| Contributor | Actor | Human or agent identity with attribution and policy |
Git branches, commits, and pull requests remain available as compatibility
views. They should not dictate the Hop-native experience.
## System shape
```mermaid
flowchart LR
UI["Hop-native web UI"] --> API["Hop control-plane API"]
API --> HDB["Hop state and evidence store"]
API --> ORCH["Attempt orchestrator"]
ORCH --> RUN["Isolated agent runners"]
API --> GAPI["Gitea API and webhooks"]
GAPI --> GIT["Git repositories"]
GAPI --> FORGE["Identity, permissions, issues, Actions, packages"]
RUN --> GIT
RUN --> HDB
```
### Ownership boundary
**Gitea owns** repositories, Git protocol, blob storage, users, organizations,
teams, baseline authorization, webhooks, Actions, releases, and packages.
**Hop owns** tasks, prompts, attempts, state graph edges, agent sessions,
checkpoints, evidence, proposals, acceptance policy, and orchestration.
**The Hop UI composes both.** A user should experience one product even when the
data comes from two services.
## Integration strategy
Start from an unmodified, pinned Gitea release and integrate through its API,
webhooks, OAuth, custom templates, and custom assets. This lets us validate the
workflow while preserving straightforward upstream upgrades.
Maintain a shallow source fork only when a required experience cannot be built
cleanly through those seams—for example, a first-class state graph inside every
repository route or authorization decisions that must be transactional with Git
writes. Every fork patch must be small, isolated, tested, and documented with an
upstream issue or a reason it is intentionally Hop-specific.
Do not put Hop's domain tables directly into Gitea's database. Services may
share stable identifiers, but each service owns its schema and migrations.
## Primary experience
### Repository home
Lead with active tasks, recent accepted outcomes, running attempts, and failing
evidence. Files and commits remain one click away, not the default narrative.
### Task page
Show the current requested outcome, prompt history, constraints, linked issues,
all attempts, and the policy required for acceptance.
### Attempt page
Stream agent activity and expose the evolving state graph, working diff,
checkpoints, check results, cost/runtime metadata, and interventions from humans.
### Proposal review
Review by outcome first: summary, behavioral changes, evidence, risks, then file
diff. Let reviewers compare multiple proposals for the same task side by side.
### Acceptance
Acceptance is a named product event. It advances the repository's accepted Hop
state, records the actor and policy decision, and materializes the corresponding
Git change atomically or fails without advancing either view.
## Initial domain model
- `repositories`: link a Hop repository to its Gitea repository identifier.
- `tasks`: requested outcome, status, creator, and acceptance policy.
- `states`: immutable typed nodes with tree identity, digest, actor, and time.
- `state_edges`: ordered, role-labelled causal relationships between states.
- `attempts`: isolated execution contexts associated with a task and base state.
- `checks`: commands or policies evaluated against an immutable checkpoint.
- `evidence`: normalized results, logs, artifacts, and provenance for checks.
- `proposals`: frozen candidate outcomes and their review status.
- `acceptances`: atomic record linking a proposal, accepted state, and Git ref.
- `actors`: human, service, and agent identities plus attestable metadata.
Use opaque, sortable IDs and repository-scoped uniqueness. Treat all mutable
status fields as projections of an append-only event history where auditability
matters.
## Delivery sequence
### Milestone 0 — foundation
- Pin and run Gitea locally with PostgreSQL and object storage boundaries.
- Add a Hop control-plane service and database.
- Establish Gitea OAuth/API authentication and webhook verification.
- Link Hop repositories to Gitea repositories.
- Define upgrade policy and an automated upstream rebase test.
### Milestone 1 — task to accepted outcome
- Create tasks and capture prompt states.
- Launch isolated attempts through a runner interface.
- Ingest checkpoints and checkpoint-bound check evidence.
- Freeze proposals and display their diffs.
- Accept a validated proposal and advance the Git default branch.
### Milestone 2 — native collaboration
- Multiple concurrent attempts and proposal comparison.
- Human intervention and prompt follow-ups within an attempt.
- Review policies, approvals, protected accepted state, and audit history.
- Notifications and task/attempt dashboards.
### Milestone 3 — ecosystem
- Public repositories and discoverability.
- Agent marketplace and reusable execution profiles.
- Organization policy, billing, usage controls, and hosted runners.
- GitHub/GitLab import and bidirectional compatibility workflows.
## Non-negotiable invariants
- A prompt is captured before project effects begin.
- Evidence always identifies the immutable checkpoint it evaluated.
- A proposal never changes after it is frozen.
- Acceptance never silently includes unrelated workspace effects.
- Human and agent actions are distinguishable and attributable.
- Git operations remain possible with standard Git clients.
- Hop state can be exported without requiring the HopWeb service forever.
## Decisions still to make
- Hosted SaaS, self-hosted distribution, or both for the first release.
- Runner isolation boundary: container, microVM, or pluggable backends.
- Whether accepted Hop state is encoded into Git refs/notes in addition to the
Hop database for portability and disaster recovery.
- The first authentication path: Gitea as OAuth provider or a shared external
identity provider.
- Product name: retain HopWeb internally or choose a public forge name.